<\/p>\n
Choosing an AGM voting system in Kenya requires a clear distinction between running a ballot and coordinating people or meeting operations. This guide sets out questions for evaluating a ballot provider. Vota's current public platform describes campaign operations; it does not establish that an AGM ballot module is available.<\/p>\n
Document the eligible membership list, resolutions, opening and closing times and who is authorised to administer the process. Clarify whether votes are secret, whether proxy arrangements apply and how a disputed eligibility decision is handled. The organisation's responsible officers should confirm the applicable rules before a provider configures the ballot.<\/p>\n
If secrecy is required, ask the vendor to explain what administrators can see and how eligibility checking is separated from vote choices. Request a demonstration using test members. Do not accept an interface label such as secure as evidence of a particular security property. Ask what independent assurance is available and what it actually covers.<\/p>\n
Test an interrupted connection, a duplicate voting attempt and a member who cannot access the invitation. Agree who may reopen a ballot and how any intervention is recorded. Ask how turnout and results are exported and reviewed without exposing secret choices. Define support responsibilities for the meeting window.<\/p>\n
Request a written scope covering the ballot workflow, member data, retention, support and results handover. For Vota specifically, confirm whether a suitable voting capability exists before treating it as a ballot supplier; its verified public offering currently focuses on campaign coordination. Neither campaign software nor a private AGM platform should be presented as an IEBC system or official public-election register.<\/p>\n
Explore Vota<\/a> to discuss the requirements in this guide.<\/p>\n